|
St. X High Continues Flirtation With Homosexuality
Truth becomes "hatred" for those who hate the
truth
(Mar./Apr. 2000)
BY
MICHAEL ARATA
DURING THE SEVEN YEARS I
taught chemistry and coached swimming at
Cincinnatis St. Xavier High (1969-76), I
suggested the school color-coordinated name for the
fledgling student newspaper: Blueprint.
That title, still in use,
turns out to have been rather prophetic, though not in a
way I anticipated. As reported in the Jan./Feb.
issue of St. Catherine Review,
todays Blueprint foreshadows the apparent
moral and social re-engineering designs of St.
Xavier school authorities.
Their actsand
failures to actseem effectively to contravene or
ignore Church teaching in grave matters of faith and
morals. Their public pronouncements say one thing;
their deeds and the deeds of others subject to their
authority say something else.
Blueprints
Dec. 17, 1999 issue featured a front-page
"press release" introducing a website produced
by two self-described homosexual alumni "to serve
gay, bisexual, transgendered, and questioning
students at St. Xavier High School."
With this virtual "support group," called the
St. X Ally Network, the two 1999 graduates "also
want to act as resources to help make St. X more
and more gay-inclusive by raising awareness and
understanding of gay issues."
This adds one more
postscript to 1996 charges of "hatred" and
"intolerance" for homosexuals at St. X,
amid revelations about the schools all-male Dance
Club, P-FLAG sensitivity training, and
administrators express prohibition of referrals to
outside agencies and individuals of questionable fidelity
to Church teachingmore about all of which, anon.
St. X Ally
"resource" listings include a "gay
bookstore," a "gay-friendly diner," and
various organizations likely to be populated primarily by
adult homosexuals; several "coming-out"
and "bisexuality" guides; a homoerotic
"webzine" that acclaims itself as "written
by, about and for queer and questioning youth";
misleading teen-homosexual suicide "studies";
a recommended catalogue of "gay" films;
and numerous "gay" propaganda outlets.
An ambivalent discussion
of "Moral Questions," is preceded by a refusal
to "attempt a defense of any specific viewpoint,
except this one: God loves you for who you are,
and neither God nor the Church wants you to be anything
different." Further,
Whether you agree with
[Church] teaching is a decision you must make
according to your own conscience.... You
should realize that merely being gay is in no way
wrong. You should not feel bad about checking
out other guys or having romantic feelings for
another guy. These feelings are natural for
you, and the Church understands and accepts this.
After two fragmentary
citations from the Catechism of the Catholic Church,
the Ally section addressing "Moral Questions"
concedes that "The Church, of course, doesn't
approve completely of homosexuality." The
website then distinguishes between homosexual orientation,
not sinful per se, and any sexual activity outside
of marriage, which the Church does consider sinful:
"We are not defending any type of sex outside of
marriage; from a Catholic point of view, it is
wrong, period."
Nevertheless, the St.
X Ally Network provides numerous links to organizations,
publications, films, and other "resources"
which not only ignore or oppose Church teaching, but
actively endorse various forms of extra-marital sexual
relations. The site further muddles its message
with misleading assertions by the American Psychiatric
Association and the American Psychological Association,
summarizing the two APAs outlooks this way:
Homosexuality is not
viewed as a disorder or sickness. On the
contrary, studies have shown that gay people are
completely healthy and are not, as a rule, different
in any particular way from straight people.
From a scientific standpoint, homosexual orientation
is completely normal and healthy.
Both APAs condemn
reparative therapy and other means of remedying
homosexual inclinations, as the Ally site informs its
visitors.
Skewed on facts, short
on faith
Rushing to contradict itself, the Ally website
misrepresents or omits key elements of Church teaching
for example, the requirement
that "Conscience must be informed and...
guided by the authoritative teaching of the Church."
And when someone "takes little trouble to find
out what is good and true, or when conscience is by
degrees almost blinded through the habit of committing
sin... the person is culpable for the evil
he commits" (cf. Catechism of the Catholic
Church, n. 1783-1794). As for
homosexuality specifically:
Basing itself on
Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as
acts of grave depravity, tradition has always
declared that homosexual acts are intrinsically
disordered. (fn., cf. Gen
19:1-29; Rom 1:24-27; 1
Cor 6:10; Tim 1:10). They
are contrary to the natural law.... Under no
circumstances can they be approved. (Catechism,
n. 2357)
Always Our Children,
the controversial statement of the National Conference of
Catholic Bishops which was revised at Romes
insistence, now tells parents they should "not
presume that your child has developed a homosexual
orientation," that while maintaining a loving
relationship, they should "provide support,
information, encouragement and moral guidance.
Parents must be vigilant about their childrens
behavior and exercise responsible interventions when
necessary."
Even the original version
of AOC observed that chastity means reserving
sexual relations for "marriage between a man and a
woman," in a context "open to the possible
creation of human life
Therefore, the Church
teaches that homogenital behavior is objectively immoral."
The APA twins ought to
have little credibility in the realm of deviant sexual
behavior. The Psychiatric Associations Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual IV (DSM IV, 1994)
doesnt necessarily consider even pedophilia
disordered: "Simply acting out on the urges
is no longer a basis for pedophilia being considered a
disorder. If the individual is not distressed or
impaired by what he is doing, then to the psychiatric
community, it is healthy behavior" (p.
528).
Repeated disruptions by
homosexual activists of the American Psychiatric
Associations early 1970s conventions is what led to
1973s de-listing of homosexuality as a
psychopathology in DSM III a largely
unprincipled capitulation that has been chronicled by
psychiatrist Jeffrey Satinover in Homosexuality and
the Politics of Truth: "The APA vote to
normalize homosexuality was driven by politics, not
science."
The American Psychological
Associations July, 1999 Psychological Bulletin
published "A Meta-Analytic Examination..."
claiming that sex between adults and children might be a
positive experience for "willing" children.
The article was hailed by the "North American
Man-Boy Love Association" (NAMBLA), the
countrys high-profile promoter of
"normalizing" pedophilia.
Indeed, as St.
Xaviers "men for others" ought to
recognize: even at a secular level, it is at best false
compassion to encourage or even to "tolerate"
behaviors which are demonstrably harmful to their
participants and to society at large. As former
homosexual Alan Medinger, now director of Regeneration, a
Baltimore-based ministry for ex-homosexuals, says in
relation to the nearly pandemic incidence of serious or
fatal diseases among homosexuals (including an elevated
breast-cancer risk among lesbians): "It is
absolutely criminal to take a confused kid and lead him
into a life that could kill him." Conversely,
authentic "charity demands beneficence and fraternal
correction" (Catechism, n. 1829), such
as can be found in ministries such as
"Courage," founded by Father John Harvey.
Courage offers a truly compassionate response to
homosexuals, gently and constructively presenting
authentic Church teaching and an assurance that with
prayer (especially the Rosary) and regular Mass
attendance, homosexuals who recognize their condition as
an unnatural affliction can be healed.
By way of background
In 1996, Blueprint published a running exchange
between St. Xavier Latin and German teacher Edward
J. Hausfeld and a St. X student. Hausfeld
wrote, "[a]lthough most of the faculty,
administration and student body seem to be working for a
greater appreciation of diversity, tolerance of
differences in sexual orientation seems to be the last
frontier to be crossed." He complained about
"an underlying distrust, even hatred, of homosexuals
in the student body" despite "annual speaking
appearances by Mrs. Marian Weage from Parents,
Friends, and Family of Lesbians and Gays (P-FLAG)."
Hausfeld then provided
phone numbers for P-FLAG, the Cincinnati Youth Group
("a support and educational group for many lesbian,
gay, and bisexual teens up to the age of 21"), and
United Way for students "struggling with questions
of their sexual identity." (Hausfeld himself
sits on the governing board of the Cincinnati Youth
Group.)
The student wrote back to
say the real problem was "growing acceptance of
homosexuality" at St. Xavier. He
expressed his dismay that a teacher in a Jesuit high
school would advise students to contact groups whose
outlooks contradict "the high schools own
beliefs." The young man suggested that
"if there are students who are struggling with their
own sexuality," the more appropriate counseling
venue would be "a psychiatrist or an organization
which would help them be heterosexual, such as Prodigal
Ministries." He added, "the
administration and religion department continue to bring
in Mrs. Weage from P-FLAG to speak to the Junior class.
P-FLAG is an immoral group contradicting the Catholic
religion."
Hausfeld replied,
"surprised and disappointed," advising the
student "to check his facts." Hausfeld
then repeated politicized claims by the two APAs and the
AMA, and asserted that "From a medical point of
view, there is nothing to cure since there is
no disease."
"If Prodigal
Ministries promises to change the orientation of people
seeking them out," Hausfeld continued, "it
bears the same relationship to good
psychological/psychiatric practice as creationism does to
the evolutionary theory." Hausfeld then
distinguished between "the condition and the
individual," and repeated highly exaggerated
teen-homosexual-suicide statistics that have been
discredited in research collected by Peter LaBarbera,
editor of the Lambda Report on Homosexuality and
director of Americans for Truth About Homosexuality.
The Oct. 11, 1996, Blueprint
issue included an article about controversy surrounding
St. Xaviers all-male Dance Club, its
homosexual overtones, and its two moderators, Hausfeld
and school counselor Marty Roberts. In the
article, Hausfeld criticized school principal Dave
Muellers mild, official inquiries about the group
as a "misunderstanding of the alternative life
style and what it means to be alternative."
Roberts responded saying, "I know there are probably
gay kids in the group
but I know that there are
probably gay kids in every group of the school. One Dance
Club member declared, "We have been the victims of
intolerance and we would like to make sure it
doesnt happen again."
The same Blueprint
edition carried a letter by Mueller and school president
Father William Verbryke, S.J, discussing not the
Dance Club, but the Hausfeld-student letter dispute.
The administrators said that "St. Xavier High
School fully embraces the teachings of the Church"
on the issue of homosexuality and that "As school
leaders, [they] expect the teachings of the Church to
guide everything from the schools personnel
policies to the editorial policies of Blueprint."
They continued:
[L]ocal Church
guidelines prohibit St. Xavier High School
from referring people to any group when there is a
question of uncertainty about that groups
support for the teachings of the Church.
Accordingly, we must express regret that the name of
a local support group for people of homosexual
orientation was published in Blueprint....
Representatives from
the [Archdiocesan high] schools will meet to explore
how Catholic schools can best educate their members
about how to live as disciples of Jesus in regard to
this challenging issue. Our discussion with
our fellow Catholic high schools will inform our
discussion among the faculty at St. Xavier.
A subsequent discussion
among Archdiocesan high school principals did occur. One
outcome, revealed in Muellers January 8, 1997
report to St. Xavier faculty, was a recommendation
that "sexual orientation" be added to
Archdiocesan personnel policies as a protected employment
classification.
A follow-up meeting
included Mueller, three other high school principals
(from Roger Bacon, Purcell-Marian, and Ursuline), three
(unidentified) faculty members, and three homosexual St.
X alumni. Muellers report of that meeting
stated "Several people endorsed the... model
of a gay/straight alliance," a model promoted
nationally by the "Gay, Lesbian, and Straight
Education Network" (GLSEN), which is open about its
hostility to the Church and religious objections to the
homosexual lifestyle. Conferees were urged to ensure that
support groups "not try to convert people to
heterosexuality."
Schools raising these
issues, Mueller reported, "should expect backlash
and prepare for it. It will help if Archdiocesan
schools stand together." Students should be
advised, the report recommended further, "that a
faculty member is available to talk to them about these
issues someone knowledgeable and confidential."
Official response?
One wonders what became of the schools 1996
assertion that the Church would "guide... the
editorial policies of Blueprint," and their
alleged prohibition against "referring people to any
group when there is ...uncertainty about that
groups support for the teachings of the Church."
The same Dec. 17,
1999 Blueprint issue that referred students
to the St. X Ally website (a gateway to numerous
other sites that disregard or scorn Church teaching) printed
a satire of "pious Christians," practically
choking on bile and spittle by the time it got around to
mentioning the
"youre-a-hellbound-sinner-if-you-dont-believe-us
St. Catherines [sic] Review."
The issue also offered a
staff editorial fretting about "sexism" at St.
Xavier, and a nearly 1200-word article by a
self-identified "pro-choice" student
complaining of a pro-life presentation by the Teen Life
Coalition of Cincinnati, whose nurse-psychologist leader
spoke, he charges, "the cloying and condescending
words of an obstinate preacher." With a
"pro-choice standpoint in tow," he had
"hoped to approach the gathering with an open mind."
The same writer was
especially offended by video images of the corpses and
tiny body parts that remained after second and
third-trimester abortions, and the apparent failure so
far of the school to bring in Planned Parenthood for
divergent perspective.
The same December issue of
Blueprint contains yet another complaint, this one
by a senior student who says he goes off campus during
free periods to smoke, since St. Xavier no longer
allows the privilege on campus. Consider the irony:
St. Xavier does not support tolerance of smoking;
yet the school expects teachers and students to accept
and even affirm homosexuality as an unalterable
"lifestyle." The problem is that
its really a tragic deathstyle, more
prematurely lethal than smoking.
By defaultor
perhaps, deliberatelySt. Xavier has become
an accessory to the tactics of the homosexual agenda.
That agendas stratagems were articulated more than
a dozen years ago by Marshall Kirk and Erastes Pill in
"The Overhauling of Straight America," Guide
Magazine, Nov. 1987. The article calls for
"the desensitization of the American public
concerning gays and gay rights" as the "first
order of business."
It then recommends a
six-step program to "accomplish this turnaround."
They advise, for example, that activists "talk about
gays and gayness as loudly and as often as possible"
because "almost any behavior begins to look
normal if you are exposed to enough of it and at close
quarters.... Against the mighty pull of
institutional Religion one must set the mightier draw of
Science and Public Opinion (the shield and the sword of
the accursed secular humanism). Such
an unholy alliance has worked before, on such topics as
divorce and abortion."
The Kirk/Pill article also
counsels activists to "portray gays as victims, not
as aggressive challengers" by making use of
"symbols which reduce the mainstreams sense of
threat, which lower its guard, and which enhance the
plausibility of victimization."
These are just the first
two steps, in part.
The recent Dec. 17 Blueprint
press release includes a pro-forma disclaimer,
saying the St. X Ally website is not
"affiliated with or endorsed by St. Xavier
High School, an all-male, Jesuit, college preparatory
school of 1400 young men in Cincinnati, Ohio. The
site was created and is maintained by [two 1999
graduates]."
But further up the same
page, Blueprint is identified as the
"official student newspaper of St. Xavier
High School." The masthead provides the same
"official student newspaper..."
identification, along with another disclaimer:
"The content of Blueprint does not necessarily
reflect the opinions or views of the adviser, faculty, or
administrators of St. Xavier High School."
But it also mentions office headquarters space provided
in the schools Room 105, and a letters mailbox
situated in the principals office.
Hausfeld and Roberts (the
St. Xavier "Dance Club" moderators) are
listed at the St. X Ally website along with
seven current St. Xavier students, six alumni, and
the parents of one "St. X Ally" website
originator as having agreed to be listed as
"resources for gay, bisexual, transgendered, and
questioning guys and their friends." Again,
theres a strategic disclaimer: "Being
on this list does not constitute an endorsement of this
website or any of the material on it. Those listed
are not connected in any official capacity with the St.
X Ally Network. Further, no statement about the
sexuality of any ally is intended or implied."
The listed
"allies" have (according to the site) promised
not to persuade students to change their sexual
orientation. (Roberts lists himself at St.
Xaviers official school website as a member of the
"Association for Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Issues in
Counseling," which institutionally opposes
therapeutic interventions seeking to alter homosexual
inclinations.)
On Dec. 2, Verbryke
and Mueller wrote to parents, emphasizing "no
connection between the web site and St.
Xavier," and cautioning that so far as they knew,
the websites creators "are neither trained nor
qualified to provide the emotional and practical support
they offer."
Nevertheless, the Feb.
17 Blueprint reported that "On Friday,
January 27, the three authors of last years
Blueprint article, You Are Not Alone, led a
forum hosted by Hands Across the Campus... [Three
students, including the two St. X Ally website
creators] were invited to share their experiences as gay
students in an all-male Catholic school."
Questions "centered on what student leaders could do
to create an atmosphere which is more
respectful, said religion teacher Peter Corrigan."
"[O]ne of HACs
core leaders" said "this was kind of like a
testing ground to see if [the two St. X Ally
originators] can give their presentation to the whole
school."
Verbryke and
Muellers Dec. 22 letter made no mention of
their 1996 prohibition against Blueprint referrals
to questionable outside-counseling sources.
Instead, as in 1996, the letter once again postulated a
need for more "faculty members whom [students] can
trust to listen to questions and concerns about sexuality
and who are qualified to guide them within the traditions
of the Catholic Church. The Archdiocese of
Cincinnati has agreed to provide training...."
St. Catherine Review
discussed the likely direction of such training in its
May/June 1999 issue. The model will apparently be
that of the "National Association of Catholic
Diocesan Lesbian and Gay Ministries," for which the
executive director is Fr. Jim Schexnayder, a
self-"outed" gay activist and GLSEN favorite
from the Oakland Diocese.
The Feb. 17 Blueprint
says that following the St. X Ally press release
and "surprise website" appearance,
Muellers administration has been "working
diligently" to form a support program for
"sexually questioning students." Blueprint
selectively interprets "the schools and
churchs teaching on the subject....
Let [him] who is without sin cast the first stone."
It leaves out the rest of what Jesus said: "go and
sin no more."
[ St. Catherine Review ]
|